Adolfo Cotter,MD

Brain-Mind Interface


Dr. Cotter practices Telemedicine in Primary Care. Conducts a competent, highly responsive Telemedicine practice since 2012, treating a variety of medical conditions from simple to very complex. Proficient with electronic medical records using a wide range of software packages and other forms of computing. Dr. Cotter also practiced Medicine doing Home Care, Urgent Care and Hospital Work.

Dr. Cotter has medical licenses in the states of Michigan, Indiana, and telehealth registration in the states of Minnesota and Florida. The links to the states medical boards are: Florida, http://www.flhealthsource.gov/telehealth/ Minnesota, https://mn.gov/boards/medical-practice/ Indiana, https://mylicense.in.gov/everification/ Michigan, https://www.michigan.gov/lara/0,4601,7-154-89334_72600_85566—,00.html

Dr. Adolfo Cotter founded Cognimetrix in 2007, motivated by a tremendous personal interest in the use of brain imaging data in the development of bionic based software to enhance creativity and intelligence.

Throughout his career, Dr. Cotter has performed brain imaging research in academic institutions such as Unversity of Toronto, University of Pennsylvania, and Emory University. He has also conducted brain imaging research for commercial companies such as at Cerebral Diagnostics.

Dr. Cotter has given lectures in Brain Imaging and attended numerous Brain Imaging meetings where he has presented his research projects. He has experience in brain imaging data acquisition and analysis for technologies such as PET, SPECT, MRI, fMRI and EEG. During his brain imaging analysis work, he has done biostatistics using a variety of software programs.

Research Bias is Increasing

As a society we have long been concerned about scientists working in industry or academia who may be influenced to write papers suited to satisfy the needs of the people financing the project. Many people I talk to are concerned that the current economic climate in western industrialized nations is aggravating this problem.

Furthermore, this funding bias is often compounded by personal bias, and this was well put in a published essay (Ioannidis, John P. A., PLoS Medicine 2005; 2(8): 696-701): “Prejudice may not necessarily have financial roots. Scientists in a given field may be prejudiced purely because of their belief in a scientific theory or commitment to their own findings.”

The problem I see is that in medicine it can be very difficult to filter erroneous research results. The only way in my opinion that we can trust the veracity of a research finding, is if the results are reproducible in other studies. Therefore, in a way, no matter how you look at it, research bias is a growing problem in the practice of medicine.

Adolfo Cotter, MD

Jan 26/2016



Leave a comment